Format: https://www.debian.org/doc/packaging-manuals/copyright-format/1.0/
Upstream-Name: jgraph
Source: https://web.eecs.utk.edu/~jplank/plank/jgraph/jgraph.html

Files: *
Copyright: 1992-2017 Jim Plank <plank@cs.utk.edu>
License: GPL

Files: debian/*
Copyright: 1997 Rob Browning <osiris@cs.utexas.edu>
           2001 Chuan-kai Lin <cklin@oink.cc.ntu.edu.tw>
           2001-2006 Pedro Zorzenon Neto <pzn@terra.com.br>
License: GPL

License: GPL
 Jgraph is distributed under the Gnu Public License (GPL) which the
 following email from the author confirms.  See
 /usr/share/common-licenses/GPL for more details.
 .
 From plank@cs.utk.edu Mon Dec  5 06:35:37 1994
 Date: Mon, 5 Dec 1994 09:34:59 -0500
 From: plank@cs.utk.edu
 To: mitchell@mdd.comm.mot.com
 Subject: Re:  jgraph for debian linux
 Content-Length: 2470
 Status: RO
 X-Lines: 66
 .
 >From mitchell@mdd.comm.mot.com Mon Dec  5 09:21:15 1994
 >To: jsp@Princeton.EDU
 >Subject: jgraph for debian linux
 >
 >>From an email exchange we had:
 >
 >>>
 >>> Sure, I'll be happy to put GNU-style copyright on jgraph.  Please
 >>> send me a copy of what you have, and I'll try to get a new release
 >>> to you as soon as I can.
 >>>
 >>
 >>OK -- here's a copy of the GPL.  Most people just provide a statement
 >>something like "This package is distributed under the GNU Public
 >>License (GPL)".  Some software authors quote the GPL, others say
 >>something like the following:
 >>
 >>  "You should have received a copy of the GPL with this package.
 >>   If not, write to the Free Software Foundation, 675 Mass Avenue,
 >>   Cambridge, MA, 0_2_1_3_9, USA"
 >>[...]
 >
 >Sorry to be bothering you about this so much, but I'm trying to wind
 >some stuff up in preparation for an upcoming vacation.  Two things --
 >
 >Firstoff, could you email me again saying it's OK to put jgraph under GPL?
 >Your earlier email fell victim to a drive to reclaim disk space.  If I
 >don't see a new release from you with a GPL copyright in it, I'll just
 >submit the jgraph package and cite your email in the interim.
 >
 .
 Indeed -- please put jgraph under GPL.  That will be quicker than me
 messing with it (unfortunately, I'm very busy right now, and won't
 be able to deal with jgraph for at least a week)
 .
 >Secondly, I've been putting together a jgraph package in anticipation
 >of the GPL'd distribution, and I note that jgraph.1 has internal problems
 >with bolding and unbolding.  THere are numerous places where text which
 >should not be bolded runs on in bold for several lines.  It looks like
 >the nroff man page might have been produced by mechanical means, because
 >I see repeatable problems in it.  I'm no nroff expert, but I noodled out
 >the problems by inspection (though I'm not sure I caught them all).  The
 >following is a diff to fix the jgraph83 man page.  It goes on for quite a
 >while as plain text, so I compressed and uuencoded it to make it a bit more
 >compact. If you'll uncompress it and take a look, the type of problems I
 >went should be obvious.
 >
 .
 Thanks -- I'll take a look at it.  Thanks for all the work you've done!
 .
 Jim
 .
 .
 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
 Jim Plank
 plank@cs.utk.edu
 http://www.cs.utk.edu/~plank
 .
 Assistant Professor
 Department of Computer Science
 University of Tennessee
 107 Ayres Hall
 Knoxville, TN 37996
 .
 615-974-4397
