# Specification Quality Checklist: FunASR / SenseVoice Backend (Adapter + Inference Snap)

**Purpose**: Validate specification completeness and quality before proceeding to planning
**Created**: 2026-07-31
**Feature**: [spec.md](../spec.md)

## Content Quality

- [x] No implementation details (languages, frameworks, APIs)
- [x] Focused on user value and business needs
- [x] Written for non-technical stakeholders
- [x] All mandatory sections completed

## Requirement Completeness

- [x] No [NEEDS CLARIFICATION] markers remain
- [x] Requirements are testable and unambiguous
- [x] Success criteria are measurable
- [x] Success criteria are technology-agnostic (no implementation details)
- [x] All acceptance scenarios are defined
- [x] Edge cases are identified
- [x] Scope is clearly bounded
- [x] Dependencies and assumptions identified

## Feature Readiness

- [x] All functional requirements have clear acceptance criteria
- [x] User scenarios cover primary flows
- [x] Feature meets measurable outcomes defined in Success Criteria
- [x] No implementation details leak into specification

## Notes

- "No implementation details" passes *in the repo's sense*: the model family
  (SenseVoice-Small, CT-Transformer) and the existing wire contract are the
  substance of the feature request itself, consistent with prior feature specs
  (007/008 name Whisper/Nemotron explicitly). The spec avoids prescribing code
  structure, vendoring strategy, and snapcraft details — those belong to the
  plan.
- No [NEEDS CLARIFICATION] markers were needed: the reference review supplied
  defaults for every open choice (thin ONNX runtime, batch-only, hotwords out of
  scope, quantize auto-detect), recorded in Assumptions for the plan to ratify.
- Items marked incomplete require spec updates before `/speckit-clarify` or `/speckit-plan`
